Two numbers, both from CDC, and one is several times the other. Surveillance counted 89,469 reported cases in 2023. CDC-published analyses of insurance claims estimate that about 476,000 people may be diagnosed with and treated for Lyme disease each year (Kugeler et al., Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2021; CDC, Lyme disease data and surveillance (opens in a new tab), read 25 September 2026) — which CDC notes may be an overestimate, since billing codes do not always reflect a confirmed diagnosis, and which counts people treated rather than people infected. The gap is not an error: surveillance counts reports that met a definition, most diagnosed Lyme is never reported, and the two figures do not share a counting era — the rules changed in 2008 and 2022, and the claims estimate was published before the later of those changes.
Thirty-two years, counted three ways.
- Confirmed cases
- Probable cases (category exists from 2008)
The 2023 total is nine times 1992’s — and the steepest jumps sit exactly on the two marked definition changes, which is a fact about surveillance as much as about ticks.
Reported cases are what surveillance captured, not what happened: CDC's own claims-based analyses estimate several times more people are diagnosed and treated each year than surveillance reports. Comparing years across a marked boundary compares definitions as well as illness.
CDC national Lyme disease surveillance via data.cdc.gov (datasets 84rx-ksgd 1992-2007, qtbi-xd4i 2008-2021, x5j9-wybp 2022-2023). Every number here is taken from CDC and checked against their own published totals, then re-checked against the live source so a figure CDC revises cannot quietly stay wrong here.
What a reported case is
When a clinician or laboratory identifies Lyme disease, many states report it to CDC’s national surveillance system. A “case” in these charts is one of those reports — not a person who felt ill, not a positive test on its own, but a report that met the surveillance definition in force that year, confirmed plus probable. That definition has changed several times — CDC lists versions dated 1995, 1996, 2008, 2011, 2017 and 2022. The chart above marks the two that added a new way to count a case: 2008, when a probable category was added, and 2022, when high-incidence jurisdictions began counting on laboratory evidence alone. A trend line that hides its own rule changes shows artifacts as epidemiology, and a jump near one of the unmarked versions may also be partly the rules changing.
What changed in 2008 and 2022
In 2008 the national case definition added the “probable” category. The chart’s second band begins there, so the step at 2008 is partly a new category being counted, not only new illness.
From 2022, states where Lyme is common report cases on laboratory evidence alone — no clinical write-up required — and nearly all of those land in the “probable” category. That is why the confirmed band collapses and the probable band leaps at the 2022 line: the counting changed more than the illness did. It is also why the 89,469 cases reported for 2023 cannot be laid directly against a 2019 figure — the two years counted differently.
Where the reports come from
Reported Lyme is intensely regional: the Northeast and the upper Midwest carry most of it. Two things sit inside that pattern and a case count cannot pull them apart — the blacklegged tick is densest there, and since 2022 those are the jurisdictions counting on laboratory evidence alone, so the same illness generates more reports there than it does elsewhere. The tick’s range is far wider than the high-count states: the eastern United States from Maine to Florida, the upper Midwest, and still moving west — the tick identification guide carries the range for each species.
For 2023, 44 jurisdictions have a published count, and 54 further cases sit in the national total without a state — real cases, either withheld from their jurisdiction because the count there was small enough to point at individual people, or published with no jurisdiction attached at all. Read the absences carefully too — a state with no published count either did not report Lyme surveillance data that year or reported a count small enough that CDC withheld it, and neither is the same as having no Lyme. The Lyme map draws every state and every year of this data, with the non-reporting states marked as exactly that.
Reported Lyme lives in a handful of states.
The Northeast and upper Midwest dominate the 2023 reports — the same geography the blacklegged tick calls home.
Top twelve of the 44 jurisdictions with a published count. A state absent from the data either did not report Lyme surveillance data to CDC for 2023 or reported a count CDC withheld as too small to show — absence here is not evidence of absence there — and 54 further cases are suppressed below state level. Counts mix Confirmed and Probable under the revised 2022 definition.
CDC Lyme disease surveillance, 2023, via data.cdc.gov (dataset x5j9-wybp; confirmed plus probable). Every state figure here comes straight from CDC and adds up to their own published national total. We re-check it against the live source, so a number CDC revises cannot quietly stay wrong here.
The year has a shape
The curve below counts weeks of report, not weeks of bite. A case joins it only after a rash is noticed, an appointment happens, a test comes back and a report is filed, so the season it draws sits somewhat later than the season that caused it. Reports climb through late spring, peak in mid-July and fall through autumn. The drawing is a single past year, named on the figure itself, and it is kept for the shape — which repeats — rather than for counts that are current. What to actually do about the season belongs to the prevention guide, which covers what works.
The year has a shape.
One historical year (2014), kept for its shape — the seasonal pattern repeats, the absolute counts are that year's. Weekly figures are provisional reports; the shallow first and last weeks owe as much to reporting lag as to ticks.
CDC national notifiable disease surveillance, weekly table II, via data.cdc.gov (dataset y6uv-t34t, United States rows, weeks 1-53 of 2014 — a historical series kept for its seasonal shape). Taken straight from CDC and re-checked against the live source, so a revised figure cannot quietly stay wrong here.
What counting cannot see
Surveillance counts reports, and most diagnosed Lyme is never reported. CDC-published analyses of insurance claims estimate that roughly 476,000 people may be diagnosed with and treated for Lyme disease each year in the United States (Kugeler et al., Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2021; CDC, Lyme disease data and surveillance (opens in a new tab), read 25 September 2026) — several times the surveillance totals above. CDC notes this may be an overestimate, because billing codes do not always reflect a confirmed diagnosis. Both numbers are real; they measure different things. Neither is an infection count, and neither says anything about any one person’s odds.
One more thing worth noticing in these charts: CDC withholds counts that are small enough to point at individual people — that is why the state chart reconciles to the national total only after adding back the cases that carry no state. This platform holds its own counts to a floor of the same kind: no aggregate here is released for a group smaller than five.
Data retrieved from data.cdc.gov on 2026-08-27
The true incidence. How much of the rise since 1992 is more illness, how much is better reporting, and how much is the definitions changing under it.